Problematic Deep Reconsideration​ System Justice Post- Verdict Crime Court Constitution Number: 34/PUU-XI/2013 and Circular Letter Supreme Court Number 07 of 2014

Authors

  • Erwin Syahruddin Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya Author
  • Ratu Aulia Laksana Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya Author
  • Adi Nur Rohman Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya Author
  • rahmat saputra Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya Author
  • Wiend Sakti Myharto STIH IBLAM Author
  • Andri Sutrisno STIH IBLAM Author
  • Sugeng Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya Author
  • Putri Ginatun Nisa Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya Author
  • Indra Lorenly Nainggolan Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya Author

Keywords:

Criminal case review, Constitutional Court Decision, Supreme Court

Abstract

An attempt to review a criminal case can only be submitted once by the convict based on clause Article 263 paragraph (3) of Law Number 8 of 1981 on the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code, which was later declared invalid after the granting of the judicial review of Article 263 paragraph (3) Law Number 8 of 1981 through Constitutional Court Decision Number: 34/PUU-XI/2013. The impact of the Constitutional Court's decision is to legalize efforts to review criminal cases more than once and, simultaneously, allow such applications to be submitted not only by the convict or his heirs. The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia responded to this condition by issuing Circular Letter Number 7 of 2014 on the Submission of Applications for Judicial Review in Criminal Cases, which essentially limits applications for judicial review in criminal cases to only be submitted once. The Circular Letter of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia is considered to be contrary to the Constitutional Court Decision Number 34/PUU-XI/2013 provisions, so it needs to be further regulated by the government.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-22